WASHINGTON
(By Eve Conant, Newsweek)
September 23, 2007
—
Richard Land had never met
one-on-one with a chairman of the Democratic National Committee. The
Tennessee evangelist, an influential force in the Southern Baptist
Convention, generally views such people as adversaries, if not enemies. So
consider his surprise when, at a nonpartisan leadership conference over the
New Year's holiday, Howard Dean leaned in and said he'd love to get together
for a private chat. Land agreed to meet for coffee at a downtown Washington
hotel. He was wary: "I brought a witness," he jokes now. Dean was there to
chip away at Land's loyalty to the GOP, and strangely, Land found himself
warming to the liberal Democrat. Among other things, he admired Dean's
frugality. "He hauled his own suitcase around, and the Capitol Hill Suites
isn't exactly fancy," Land tells NEWSWEEK. "I was impressed." More
important, the two men had something to talk about, and did so cordially.
"Dean told me how the Democrats were pro-life in that they wanted a country
in which abortion was rare. I said, 'I agree, but we disagree how to get
there.' Still, it was certainly a change in tone."
For the Democrats, it's a change in tactics as well — an
audacious, if not quixotic, effort to win over a constituency that has been
solidly Republican for a quarter century. Dean and other Democratic
strategists hope to take advantage of deepening discontent with the GOP
among some evangelicals. As a movement, conservative Christians have yet to
get fired up about any of the leading Republican presidential candidates.
There was a brief wave of enthusiasm for Fred Thompson, but that may be
ebbing. One of the nation's most influential evangelicals, James Dobson,
wrote a scathing e-mail about Thompson, obtained by the Associated Press
last week, in which he objected to the candidate's opposition to a
constitutional marriage amendment and said Thompson had "no passion, no
zeal." Meanwhile, Mitt Romney suffers among some evangelicals because of
bias against his Mormon faith. Front runner Rudy Giuliani leaves
conservative Christians particularly cold. "If the Republicans are foolish
enough to nominate the pro-choice Giuliani, that will give the Democratic
Party license to hunt for evangelical votes," says Land, who has been
contacted by both the Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton campaigns. "I don't
know how successful they'll be, but at least they'll have that license."
No one expects miracles, of course. Conservative
Christians started shifting to the Republicans as the "party of values" in
1979, when Jerry Falwell founded the Moral Majority. They were the most
important bloc of voters in George W. Bush's victories in 2000 and 2004. But
the movement is not as cohesive as it once was. Many younger evangelicals
are worried about issues beyond the traditional struggles over abortion,
school prayer and gay marriage. They're becoming vocal about the
environment, AIDS, poverty and genocide — a newer set of "values" that
Democrats are more comfortable addressing.
The Democrats see an opening — not to conquer the movement
but to harness some of its energy for themselves. "In the past, we've come
off as dismissive to evangelicals," Dean tells NEWSWEEK. "But our party has
become much more comfortable talking about faith and values." Dean has met
with four or five influential evangelicals in addition to Land, sometimes
visiting their offices to talk. "Are we going to abandon Roe v. Wade? No.
But a lot can be done to prevent teen pregnancy and abortions. There is a
lot we do agree on." The DNC under Dean has stepped up its Faith in Action
initiative, an outreach program created in the wake of the Democrats' 2004
defeat. Run by a Pentecostal minister, it has trained about 150 people.
Such efforts, along with general disillusionment with
Bush, may have already paid off. According to a Pew Research Center survey
in February, support for Democratic candidates among white evangelicals
under 30 jumped from 16 to 26 percent between the 2004 and 2006 elections.
Some evangelical leaders now say they're tired of being viewed as an
appendage of the GOP, or any other party. "We want to be viewed as we are —
people of faith — not a political bloc," says Leith Anderson, president of
the National Association of Evangelicals.
For now, the Democrats' best target may be Hispanics, the
fastest-growing subset of evangelicals. They voted strongly in support of
Bush in 2004, but many are now angered by the GOP's handling of immigration.
"All of a sudden we're a security problem? We're the drug dealers who are
destroying the nation?" says Luis Cortés, president of the Esperanza USA
network of 10,000 evangelical churches. "If the Republicans choose a
candidate who takes a negative stance on immigration, then I believe you
will see a large defection." Until now, the only GOP candidate taking a
strong, "positive" stance on immigration is John McCain. But Christian
conservatives generally reject him, in part because of his push for
campaign-finance reform.
Cortés is flirting with the Democrats, or at least they're
flirting with him. Since June, he has received several calls from Obama and
has met with Clinton and Bill Richardson. Sam Rodriguez, president of the
National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference, which represents more
than 17,000 churches, also senses a changing mood. If Democratic candidates
had called him in 2004, Rodriguez says, he's not sure he "would have even
picked up the phone." But now "the GOP has completely abdicated ... the
evangelical Hispanic vote as a result of the immigration-reform debacle ...
This is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for the Democratic Party."
Clinton, Obama and John Edwards all have senior staffers
in charge of reaching out to religious groups. "There's a lot of common
ground here with evangelicals on the genocide in Darfur, ending human
trafficking and making sure that religious liberty is not static around the
world," says Burns Strider, director of faith-based operations for the
Clinton campaign. (By contrast, talking to evangelicals in 2004 was
considered "a waste of resources," says Mara Vanderslice, who was hired by
John Kerry only eight months before Election Day to reach out to the faith
community.) Obama's national director of religious affairs, Joshua DuBois,
says he has contacted more than 75 evangelical leaders since he joined the
campaign on its first day. Speaking at an AIDS conference sponsored by the
evangelical Rick Warren last year, Obama talked about contraception as a
strategy to fight the disease, and "there was a standing ovation," says
DuBois. The campaign has hosted more than two dozen "faith and politics"
forums in New Hampshire and Iowa and is planning more for South Carolina.
Can the Democrats really become the party of the
fundamentalist faithful? By playing footsie with Democrats, at least some
evangelicals may be aiming to provoke GOP leaders into giving them more
attention. Christian conservatives complain regularly that the Republican
Party doesn't hew to their agenda, but they've almost always pulled the red
levers in the end. "We're still kind of frozen in the twilight zone with
many of the Republican candidates," says Tony Perkins, who heads the
conservative Family Research Council. "If the Democrats follow through with
substantive policy initiatives that reflect their newfound faith, they could
make headway. But it's got to be more than just talk." Darkly, he warns
there is always the option of "a third-party candidate for president."
That's a signal to both parties: show us some love ... or else.