WASHINGTON
(By Michael Finnegan, LATimes) April 29, 2007
— President Bush's unpopularity and a string of political setbacks have
created a toxic climate for the Republican Party, making it harder to
raise money and recruit candidates for its drive to retake control of
Congress.
Some of the GOP's top choices to run for the House next year have
declined, citing what Rep. Thomas M. Davis III (R-Va.) called a
"poisonous" environment. And Republicans' fundraising edge, an important
advantage over the last five years, has dwindled.
With GOP clout diminished after November's election losses, the
Republicans' national committee and their House and Senate campaign
committees together raised the same amount as the Democrats in the first
quarter of the year — and Democrats ended the period with more cash in
the bank. At this point four years ago, Republicans had more than twice
the money Democrats did.
"The reality is the Republican brand right now is just not a good
brand," said Tim Hibbitts, an independent Oregon pollster. "For
Republicans, the only way things really get better … is if somehow, some
way, Iraq turns around."
Jennifer Duffy of the nonpartisan Cook Political Report said the party
was "desperately in need of some Prozac."
The problems can be seen in such places as Florida's 22nd Congressional
District, which hugs the coast north of Fort Lauderdale. Republicans
held that House seat for a quarter-century. But since losing it last
year, the party has had trouble finding a top-tier candidate for it.
Two of the GOP's choices, both state legislators, declined to run. A
third, Boca Raton's mayor, said he was weighing whether a Republican had
any hope of retaking the district.
"You have to sort of lay a bet down now on what will be the environment
in 18 months," said Mayor Steven Abrams, who must leave his current
office because of term limits.
Though Republicans have recruited many solid candidates in their effort
to retake Capitol Hill — and they have more than 18 months to improve
their fortunes — the environment could get worse.
Damaged by ethics scandals in 2006, the GOP in recent weeks has seen FBI
raids at businesses or homes connected to two of its congressmen. A
federal agency last week began an investigation into Bush advisor Karl
Rove's political operation, and congressional panels authorized a flurry
of subpoenas related to White House political activities and the run-up
to the Iraq war.
Three-term Rep. Rob Simmons of Connecticut, who lost his seat last year
by 83 votes, said he turned down an appeal from the GOP to run again in
2008, partly because of the dismal political climate. In a district
dominated by Democrats, he said, it has become impossible for even a
moderate Republican like himself to win — especially since he voted to
authorize the war in Iraq. Republicans in recent days said they had
found a solid candidate to run in Simmons' place: the former commander
of the area's naval base.
In Colorado, Republican Sen. Wayne Allard's decision not to seek
reelection set the stage for one of the nation's most competitive 2008
races. But the top choice of party leaders, former Rep. Scott McInnis,
has taken a pass, citing family reasons. McInnis had nearly $1 million
stockpiled for the race.
Broader signs of Republican distress also are turning up across the
country.
When voters five years ago were asked which party they identified with,
neither Democrats nor Republicans held an advantage. Now 50% of voters
say they are aligned with the Democrats, and 35% with Republicans,
according to a survey released last month by the nonpartisan Pew
Research Center for the People & the Press.
And in New Hampshire, nonpartisan pollster Dick Bennett said the
atmosphere was so sour that he was having a tough time getting
Republicans to participate in surveys. The war, high gas prices and
unhappiness with the Bush administration have dampened their interest
sharing opinions, he said.
A few years ago, "they would make arguments in favor of the president,
and they don't anymore," Bennett said. "They don't defend the president
on anything."
Republicans do hold some advantages in the 2008 congressional elections,
including district lines for many contested House seats that are drawn
in their favor.
More than 60 Democrats will have to defend seats in districts where
voters backed President Bush in 2004, Republicans say, suggesting that
many of those incumbents will be too liberal to win. By contrast, only
seven Republicans are defending seats in districts that went for
Democratic presidential candidate John F. Kerry, they say.
Moreover, GOP officials say conditions are likely to improve once the
party settles on a presidential nominee — who they believe will eclipse
Bush in the public eye and diminish his drag on Republican prospects.
"No question, the president's gone through a rough patch. But the
central figure for the Republicans next year is not going to be George
Bush," said Oklahoma Rep. Tom Cole, chairman of the National Republican
Congressional Committee.
Rep. Brian P. Bilbray (R-Solana Beach) described Bush as "a millstone
that most members will not have to be carrying around" once the
Republican presidential nominee emerges.
Still, some Republicans are wary about 2008, saying that potential
candidates and donors are having trouble assessing the landscape.
"It's just a very uncertain environment," said Abrams, the Boca Raton
mayor. "One day you'll have the issue with the [Justice Department's
firing of eight] U.S. attorneys, which hurts Republicans. The next day
[House Speaker] Nancy Pelosi goes off to Syria, which in this district
is unacceptable."
The GOP's relatively weak fundraising totals for the first quarter could
also complicate the party's reelection effort, wrote Amy Walter of the
Cook Political Report in a recent assessment. Though it can be dangerous
to read too much into these early signals, she wrote, "a weak bank
account doesn't just make a bad headline, it also makes an incumbent
more attractive to a potential challenger."
At the same time, she wrote, the recent totals "tell us that Republicans
aren't going to be able to count on their traditional money advantage
over Democrats," which will limit the number of Democratic-held House
seats they can target.
Democrats outnumber Republicans in the House 232 to 201, with two
vacancies
In the Senate, the party breakdown is 49-49, but two independents side
with the Democrats, giving them control.
The Senate map for the 2008 election is difficult for Republicans. They
will have to defend seats in four states that went Democratic in the
2004 presidential election. Those seats are held by Gordon H. Smith of
Oregon, Norm Coleman of Minnesota, Susan Collins of Maine and John E.
Sununu of New Hampshire.
Moreover, Sens. John W. Warner (R-Va.) and Chuck Hagel (R-Neb.) have not
committed to running for reelection. Democrats have shown potential for
winning general elections in both states, and the veteran lawmakers'
departures could force Republicans to spend money on what otherwise
would be considered safe seats.
Last week brought more potential bad news for Republicans:
An obscure federal agency, the Office of Special Counsel, said it would
investigate several matters concerning the GOP, including whether a U.S.
attorney was fired for political reasons. The office also intends to
look at Bush administration officials' use of Republican National
Committee e-mail accounts for government business, and political
presentations by White House staff to Cabinet agencies. The office
enforces the Hatch Act, which generally bars the use of taxpayer
resources for campaign purposes.
Also, Democratic-led congressional committees authorized five subpoenas,
escalating their investigations of White House and Justice Department
activities. One of them could compel Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice
to testify on the prewar claim that Iraq had tried to buy uranium.
And in recent weeks, two GOP congressmen — John T. Doolittle of
Roseville and Rick Renzi of Arizona — temporarily stepped down from
spots on coveted committees after FBI raids that were part of separate
corruption investigations.
Overall, Republicans now resemble "a beaten-down stock," said Cole, the
National Republican Congressional Committee chairman. But he said he was
optimistic about party fundraising and candidate recruitment.
"We're a heck of a good buy," he said, "if anyone knows how to evaluate
the stock."