WASHINGTON (By
Jonathan Weisman, Washington Post) April
22, 2007 —
The abrupt resignations last week of
two Republican House members from their sensitive committee assignments
have thrust lingering legal and ethics issues back into the limelight,
potentially complicating GOP efforts to retake Congress next year.
On successive days, Wednesday and Thursday, Reps. John
T. Doolittle (Calif.) and Rick Renzi (Ariz.) disclosed FBI raids on
their wives' businesses. The men proclaimed their innocence, but the
raids exposed their legal jeopardy. The announcements were only the most
recent in a series of developments that have kept the focus on the old
ethical and legal clouds that helped chase the Republican Party from
power on Capitol Hill.
Two other lawmakers face possible ethics
investigations amid allegations that they pressured a U.S. attorney in
New Mexico to indict Democrats before last year's fall elections.
Rep. Gary G. Miller (R-Calif.), under investigation by
the FBI for a series of land deals, is now facing Democratic ads
alleging that he lied about a land sale that he declined to pay taxes
on.
Rep. Jerry Lewis (R-Calif.) still faces FBI scrutiny
of his work as chairman of the House Appropriations Committee, and this
month, his campaign filings showed that he has racked up $892,951.69 in
legal fees since July. And for the first time, Rep. Tim Murphy (R-Pa.)
reported significant legal fees -- $15,620.60 -- in his campaign filing
this month, as he tries to stave off accusations that he used
taxpayer-funded congressional staff and resources to do political work.
"Everybody's kind of a little bit numb," said Rep.
Jack Kingston (R-Ga.). "There's this, 'What else can happen now?'
feeling going around here."
The ethics issue burst back into focus with the FBI
raids involving Doolittle and Renzi.
Doolittle had been trying to retool his battered image
when he disclosed that the FBI had raided his family's Northern Virginia
home, where his wife runs her business. Both he and his wife have been
tied to convicted lobbyist Jack Abramoff, and he has admitted obtaining
funds for a defense contractor linked to the bribery conviction of
then-Rep. Randy "Duke" Cunningham (R-Calif). Under pressure from GOP
leaders, Doolittle quickly gave up his coveted seat on the House
Appropriations Committee, while his attorneys said he has done nothing
wrong.
Renzi notified House Minority Leader John A. Boehner
(R-Ohio) that federal investigators had raided the offices of Patriot
Insurance Agency, his wife's business, in Sonoita, Ariz. The search was
part of an ongoing investigation into Renzi-drafted land-swap
legislation that would have enriched a political benefactor. Renzi
stepped down from his seat on the sensitive House Permanent Select
Committee on Intelligence "to avoid any unnecessary distractions on the
panel and its critical work," Boehner said.
"I view these actions as the first step in bringing
out the truth," Renzi said.
To be sure, Democrats have their own issues to contend
with. An aide in the New Orleans office of Rep. William J. Jefferson
(D-La.) was subpoenaed last week to testify before a grand jury
investigating corruption and bribery allegations, signaling that the
inquiry is still ongoing. Earlier this year, Rep. Alan B. Mollohan (D-W.Va.),
who chairs the House Appropriations subcommittee that funds the
departments of Commerce and Justice, was forced to recuse himself from
law enforcement funding matters because he is under FBI investigation.
But, for the GOP, the spate of bad news over ethics
has clouded its efforts to portray the new Democratic majority as
ineffective, while it has helped Democrats stay on the political
offensive. Ethics troubles loomed large last year in the Democrats'
sweep of Congress. Republicans lost seats in Florida, Texas,
Pennsylvania, California, Arizona, Ohio, North Carolina and Montana,
where ethical lapses were decisive. And Democrats will use the new
ethics charges to remind voters why they pushed out the Republicans,
said Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), chairman of the Democratic
Congressional Campaign Committee.
"It's all a stark reminder to voters about why they
don't want to turn power back to a Republican Congress that betrayed the
public and used their majority for personal financial gain and to reward
special interests," he said.
Rep. Tom Cole (R-Okla.), the chairman of the National
Republican Congressional Committee, was more sanguine. The Democrats'
theme of "a culture of corruption" is unlikely to break through to
voters in a presidential election year with so much at stake, he said.
And individual cases coming into focus in early 2007 will likely be
resolved by the fall of 2008. "There's a long time between now and the
election," he said.
But Cole conceded that ethics could be a factor in a
few individual races. And with the GOP needing 17 seats to recapture the
House, losing seats would increase the number of incumbent Democrats the
GOP would have to defeat.
The DCCC is interviewing candidates seeking to run
against Renzi, who escaped a challenge last year from a high-profile
Democrat but still won only 52 percent of the vote. Former military
pilot Charlie Brown, who held Doolittle to 49 percent in November, has
already filed papers for a rematch and has banked $132,000 in the first
quarter for his run.
But Democratic campaign efforts go beyond the subjects
of FBI raids. The DCCC has already aired two radio ads raising ethics
charges against Rep. Heather A. Wilson (R-N.M.), who has admitted
calling now-fired U.S. Attorney David C. Iglesias before the November
elections to inquire about an investigation of voter fraud. Wilson, a
perennial Democratic target, eked out a win in November -- by 861 votes.
"Congresswoman Wilson's call to David Iglesias was
entirely appropriate, and it's a shame that national Democrats have
launched a baseless partisan attack smearing her good name," said
Enrique Knell, a Wilson spokesman.
After obtaining footage through a Freedom of
Information Act request, the DCCC has aired some of it showing Miller
repeatedly pleading with city officials in Monrovia, Calif., to buy 165
acres of his property. Miller made more than $10 million on the 2002
sale, but he sheltered the profits from capital-gains taxes by asserting
that the sale was forced under the threat of eminent domain. Repeated
calls to Miller's office were not returned yesterday.
And with other Republicans shelling out so much money
to lawyers, Democratic political operatives are sure more shoes will
drop in investigations that started long before their party took control
of Capitol Hill.
"It'll only reinforce why they voted for the Democrats
in the first place," Van Hollen said.