| |
 |
|
Hillary Clinton |
|
|
WASHINGTON DC (By Joe Klein, Time)
January 10, 2008 —
In the spring of
1995, I was part of a small press pack
that accompanied a wounded Hillary
Clinton on her first major international
trip as First Lady, to south Asia. She
was extremely wary of us at first, but
that didn't last very long, as the
exotic sights and sounds overwhelmed us
all. It was, I suspect, a turning point
in Clinton's life. Back home, she had
faced dangerous, vitriol-spewing crowds
at the end of the health-care battle,
but each time she stepped off the big
plane with the grand words "United
States of America" emblazoned on its
side, the crowds were huge and adoring.
And as she went from place to place,
visiting local programs that helped
women overcome the vicious prejudices
visited upon them by male-dominated
cultures, a metamorphosis took place:
gradually, she seemed to put the
health-care debacle behind her and
realize there was other work to be done,
if not as co-President, then as First
Lady. There were all these women who
needed a public voice. One day in
Ahmadabad, India, she visited a
remarkable economic program for
untouchable women who were ragpickers.
They sang We Shall Overcome for her in
Gujarati, and tears filled her eyes. All
us cynics in the press corps went weepy
too.
As the
trip went on, a funny thing happened.
She started to open up to the press. Off
the record, of course. She would come
back to the press section of the plane,
dressed in a sweatshirt, wearing her
Coke-bottle eyeglasses, and schmooze. I
have a picture of the two of us, heads
thrown back, laughing at some
long-forgotten joke as we headed home.
All of
which came to mind as Clinton
experienced a similar metamorphosis in
New Hampshire last week — an unclenching
that took place under far more difficult
circumstances, with the whole world
watching her every move. It was a rocky
path with an unexpected ending. She made
mistakes, said a few things in the heat
of battle that she probably regrets. But
she also allowed herself some tentative
moments of spontaneity — not just her
now famous near-tears in Portsmouth, but
moments of humor and anger and grace as
well.
My
favorite came in a confrontation with
the television talk-show host Chris
Matthews during a press conference — a
press conference! — in Nashua. Matthews
was pushing her on Iraq. How was she
different from Barack Obama? Back and
forth it went, Clinton parrying every
thrust easily. Finally, Matthews
capitulated. "Please, come on the show,"
he said. Clinton chuckled and said
sarcastically, "Well, right!" Then she
joked, "I don't know what to do with men
who are obsessed with me." And then she
went over, gave him a hug, patted his
cheek and said, "Christopher ... baby
..." Matthews seemed to melt. He asked
her how she was doing. "I'm good!" she
replied brightly.
But she
wasn't good. She was shell-shocked,
reeling from her loss in Iowa and polls
that showed her cratering in New
Hampshire. The search for some way to
counter Obama's easy brilliance, her
search for a true public voice, was
proving much harder than her discovery
of a new mission back in India in 1995.
And then it happened, in the oddest
possible way. It happened at a listless
rally on Monday afternoon in the town of
Dover, where her husband had resurrected
his cratering campaign in 1992 by
declaring, "I'll be there for you until
the last dog dies."
With
the last dog on life support, Senator
Clinton was introduced by a woman named
Francine Torge, who said something
startling and dreadful: "Some people
compare one of the other candidates to
John F. Kennedy. But he was
assassinated, and Lyndon Baines Johnson
was the one who actually [completed
Kennedy's work]." That clearly remained
in Clinton's mind, because a few hours
later, she was tastelessly comparing
Obama to Martin Luther King Jr. in an
interview with Fox News. King's dream
"became a reality," she said, "because
we had a President who said we are going
to do it and actually got it
accomplished."
The
specter of Lyndon Johnson, Walter
Mondale, Michael Dukakis and all the
other dull, disastrous, detail-oriented
Democratic politicians of the recent
past had haunted her campaign from the
start. Earlier that day she had even
attacked Obama using Mondale's famous
line about Gary Hart, "Where's the
beef?" But now she seemed to be shedding
her private dismay that she could never
be a charismatic politician like Obama
or Kennedy, or her husband, and
embracing her inner Johnson — at least
the can-do policy-wonk version of that
notoriously strange President. But she
would be Johnson with a twist, with
passion and with a specific constituency
in mind: all those women who had to
juggle jobs, children, careless, selfish
men, and menopause — and, all too often,
divorce. The working women of America,
like the woman who had asked the simple,
touching question in Portsmouth that had
started her tears flowing: "How do you
do it? Who does your hair?"
Those
women responded by coming out for her in
droves in New Hampshire. They represent
a very moving counterforce to the
legions of young people Obama has
activated across the country. Both
Clinton and Obama have a solid base now
— and both have a similar problem:
trying to reach past that base,
especially to the working-class (white)
men who may well decide the general
election in states like Ohio. Clinton's
"beef" may prove the more sturdy product
in a party that thinks, as labor leader
Andrew Stern once said, that electing a
President is College Bowl, but it's
really American Idol. Obama may be
inspirational, but Clinton is now
inspired. "I listened to you," she said
at the beginning of her spare, elegant
acceptance speech. "And in the process,
I found my own voice."
If she
is smart — smarter about herself than
she has been in the past — she will
continue to run her campaign in the
open, as she did the last few days in
New Hampshire, answering questions from
the press and public, allowing her humor
(and a bit of anger) to shine. She will,
finally, trust her own instincts and
stop relying so much on polls and market
testing. A big election like this one is
won on macrovision, not the microtrends
that her strategist Mark Penn keeps
touting. And in facing an idealistic
opponent, she will remember that she,
not her husband, was the one who came up
with the famous line "I still believe in
a place called Hope."
But we
in the press have to be smarter too. We
were wildly stupid in the days before
the New Hampshire primary, citing
Clinton meltdown after Clinton meltdown
— the tears, the flash of anger in the
debate — that never really happened. We
really need to calm down, become more
spin-resistant, even if our
sleep-deprived sources tend to overreact
to every slip and poll dip in the
campaign. If we are lucky, this will be
a long and complicated race — which is
exactly what this country deserves right
now — and we need to watch it with our
very best, most patient eyes, just as
the public seems to be doing.