In
First Debate, 8 Democrats Differ on Details but Agree in Condemning
Iraq War
ORANGEBURG, S.C.
(By Dan Balz, Washington Post) April 27, 2007
— Democratic presidential
candidates largely set aside their differences here Thursday and
presented a united front of opposition to President Bush and his
Iraq policy, urging the president not to veto newly passed
legislation that sets a timetable for beginning the withdrawal of
U.S. forces from the conflict.
In their first debate of the 2008 campaign, the
Democrats showed some disagreement over the issue of cutting off
funding for the war and vied with one another to demonstrate their
willingness to retaliate swiftly if the United States is attacked by
terrorists.
But they found common ground in accusing Bush of
making the country less safe and damaging U.S. relations abroad
through foreign policy and argued that the president is ignoring the
will of the American people by refusing to shift course dramatically
in Iraq.
"The American people have spoken," said Sen.
Hillary Rodham Clinton (N.Y.). "The Congress has voted, as of today,
to end this war. And now we can only hope that the president will
listen."
The 90-minute debate covered a wide range of
issues, including health care, global climate change and the recent
Supreme Court decision upholding a ban on a late term abortion
procedure -- a decision critics have said could lay the foundation
for overturning Roe v. Wade. Although public opinion shows
support for the ban, the candidates uniformly criticized the court's
decision.
The debate appeared unlikely to alter the shape of
the Democratic race, which has divided along two tiers, with
Clinton, Sen. Barack Obama (Ill.) and former senator John Edwards
(N.C.) leading in polls and fundraising and well ahead of the other
major candidates: Sen. Joseph R. Biden Jr. (Del.), Sen. Christopher
J. Dodd (Conn.) and New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson. All more than
held their own in the debate.
As the perceived front-runner, Clinton might have
been seen as the likely target for attack, but the candidates
largely avoided engaging one another directly -- and the format,
which was often fast-paced and moved from topic to topic, offered no
easy opportunities to do so.
The closest approximation to a direct engagement
came when Edwards was asked whether he was specifically talking
about Clinton when he has said the country wants a leader who is
willing to admit mistakes.
"I think that's a question for the conscience of
anybody who voted for this war," he said. "I mean, Senator Clinton
and anyone else who voted for this war has to search themselves and
decide whether they believe they've voted the right way."
Clinton, who has consistently been forced to
defend her vote for the war along the campaign trail, responded by
saying what she has said before: "I take responsibility for my vote.
Obviously, I did as good a job I could at the time. It was a sincere
vote based on the information available to me. And I've said many
times that, if I knew then what I now know, I would not have voted
that way."
Democrats have argued over Iraq through the early
part of the campaign, but as congressional Democrats have moved to
challenge Bush, the candidates have found their differences
narrowed. But upcoming steps in the debate between Congress and the
White House could expose more disagreement, as Thursday's debate
showed.
Dodd was the lone major candidate to underscore
his support for eventually cutting off funding for the war -- a
position echoed with even more vigor by the two most outspoken
opponents of the war in the field, Rep. Dennis J. Kucinich (Ohio)
and former senator Mike Gravel (Alaska).
But if the leading candidates avoided going after
one another, NBC anchor Brian Williams asked them probing questions
about their own past statements and records, with Edwards quizzed
about whether his campaign should have paid for $400 haircuts and
about his role as a consultant to a hedge fund.
Edwards quickly agreed that having the campaign
pay for the haircuts was a mistake that had been corrected, but he
shifted the question to a potential conflict between his lifestyle
and his advocacy of antipoverty programs. "If the question is . . .
whether I live a privileged and blessed lifestyle now, the answer to
that's 'yes,' " he said. "A lot of us do. But it's not where I come
from. And I've not forgotten where I come from."
Obama was asked about contributions from a donor
indicted for demanding kickbacks on business deals. Obama said, "I
have denounced it, but I have a track record of bringing people
around this new kind of politics, since I was in the state
legislature."
Noting a poll showing a sizeable portion of the
public holding an unfavorable view of her, moderator Williams asked
Clinton why so many Republicans seemed eager to run against her.
"I take it as a perverse form of flattery,
actually, that if they weren't worried, they would not be so
vitriolic in their criticism of me," Clinton replied. "Because I
believe that the country is ready for change."
In a lighter moment, Biden was asked about his
propensity for putting his foot in his mouth and his well known
verbosity. Could he assure the American people he would not
embarrass the country on the international stage?
The normally voluble Biden gave a one word reply:
"Yes." Then he stopped, to laughter from the audience.
The debate came hours after the Senate voted 51 to
46 for a war funding bill that includes language on withdrawing
troops from Iraq, which has drawn a presidential veto threat. The
candidates used the forum to denounce the war as a grave mistake.
"This war is a disaster," said Richardson. "We
must end this war."
Obama argued that if Bush goes ahead with the veto
Democrats should seek additional support from Republicans to
override it. "When I listen to mothers and fathers all across
America," he said, "they are telling me it's time to come home."
The sharpest exchanges came between Kucinich and
Gravel on one side and Obama on the other. Kucinich challenged Obama
for saying he would take no option off the table in dealing with
Iran, saying the Illinois senator was setting the stage for war.
"I think it would be a profound mistake for us to
initiate a war with Iran," Obama replied. "But, have no doubt, Iran
possessing nuclear weapons will be a major threat to us and to the
region."
A few minutes later Gravel picked up the attack,
"Tell me, Barack, who do you want to nuke?"
"I'm not planning to nuke anybody right now, Mike,
I promise," Obama said to laughter in the audience.