NEW
YORK CITY (NYTimes Editorial) January 12, 2007 —
From all the ruckus raised by the administration and its
patrons in the pharmaceutical industry, you would think
that Congressional Democrats were out to destroy the
free market system when they call for the government to
negotiate the prices of prescription drugs for Medicare
beneficiaries. Yet a bill scheduled for a vote in the
House of Representatives today is sufficiently flexible
to allow older Americans to benefit from the best
efforts of both the government and the private drug
plans.
The secretary of health and human services should be
able to exert his bargaining power with drug companies
in those cases in which the private plans have failed to
rein in unduly high prices — leaving the rest to the
drug plans. The result could be lower costs for
consumers and savings for the taxpayers who support
Medicare.
Under current law, written to appease the
pharmaceutical industry, the government is explicitly
forbidden from using its huge purchasing power to
negotiate lower drug prices for Medicare beneficiaries.
That job is left to the private health plans that
provide drug coverage under Medicare and compete for
customers in part on the basis of cost.
The Democrats’ bill would end the prohibition and
require — not just authorize — the secretary of health
and human services to negotiate prices with the
manufacturers. That language is important since the
current secretary, Michael Leavitt, has said he does not
want the power to negotiate.
No data is publicly available to indicate what prices
the private health plans actually pay the manufacturers.
But judging from what they charge their beneficiaries,
it looks like they pay significantly more for many drugs
than do the Department of Veterans Affairs — which by
law gets big discounts — the Medicaid programs for the
poor, or foreign countries.
The administration argues, correctly, that the
private plans have held costs down and that there is no
guarantee the government will do any better. The bill,
for example, prohibits the secretary from limiting which
drugs are covered by Medicare, thus depriving him of a
tool used by private plans and the V.A. to win big
discounts from companies eager to get their drugs on the
list. The secretary does have the bully pulpit, which he
can use to try to bring down the cost of overpriced
drugs.
The bill also does not require the secretary to
negotiate prices for all 4,400 drugs used by
beneficiaries. A smart secretary could simply determine
which prices paid by the plans seemed most out of line
with the prices paid by other purchasers and then
negotiate only on those drugs. The private plans are
explicitly allowed to negotiate even lower prices if
they can. This sort of flexibility should pose no threat
to the free market. It is time for the Medicare drug
program to work harder for its beneficiaries without
worrying so much about the pharmaceutical companies.