|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The 2008 Presidential Candidates on Health Care |
 |
|
WASHINGTON (By Farhana Hossain, NYTimes) July
6, 2007
—
Presidential candidates in both
parties are promising to overhaul the nation's health care
system and cover more — if not all — of the nation's
uninsured. In 2005, 44.8 million people — 15.3 percent of
the population — were without health insurance, according to
estimates released by the Census Bureau in March. The
leading Democrats are competing among themselves over who
has the better plan to control costs and approach universal
coverage. The Republicans, for the most part, are promising
to expand coverage without increasing the role of the
federal government, and reduce cost through tax incentives.
Most of the candidates have not presented a detailed outline
of their health care plans, but here is what they have said
so far.
|
|
DEMOCRATS |
|
PROPOSAL TO EXPAND COVERAGE |
|
PAYING FOR ADDITIONAL COSTS |
 |
Joseph
R.
Biden Jr.
Democrat
|
|
IMMEDIATELY INSURE
EVERYONE UNDER 18
|
|
END WAR IN IRAQ; ROLL
BACK PRESIDENT BUSH'S TAX CUTS FOR THE HIGHEST EARNERS
|
 |
|
 |
Hillary
Rodham Clinton
Democrat
|
|
HAS PLEDGED TO
ENSURE EVERYONE;
DETAILS OF THE PLAN TO COME
There are three parts to my approach. First, lowering
costs for everyone. Second, improving quality for
everyone. Third, insuring everyone.
I think we will move toward requiring employers
to participate, the way Massachusetts does, or
the way California is considering, and if you
don't insure your employees, then you're going
to have to pay some kind of a per employee
amount into a fund so that everybody can be
given insurance. But we're also going to make it
possible for us to lower cost. And the reason I
haven't sent out a plan and said, 'Well here's
exactly what I think we should do,' is because
during this campaign, I want the ideas that
people have.
|
|
DOES NOT WANT TO PUT
MONEY INTO THE SYSTEM WITHOUT CONTROLLING COST FIRST
"I hate to put more money into our national health care
system until we get the cost down and we have a better
system… We've got to get the cost under control. Why would
we put more money into a dysfunctional system? .
HAS OUTLINED A SEVEN-POINT PLAN TO
CONTROL COST
• Ensure better preventative care
• Modernize record-keeping
• Streamline care for the chronically ill
• Create large insurance pools
• Start a "Best Practices Institute" to finance research
• Control prescription drug costs
• Revise medical malpractice system
|
 |
|
 |
Chris
Dodd
Democrat
|
|
HAS PLEDGED UNIVERSAL
HEALTH CARE, SUBSIDIZED BY EMPLOYERS AND THE GOVERNMENT
Everyone participates, everyone benefits. All the
stakeholders -- individuals, employers, the government --
are involved in coming up with a system here that would make
it possible to reduce those numbers of 47 million of our
fellow citizens who have no health care to make sure they'll
be included. …
• Second is prevention alone. Minimum we try to do is see to
it to reduce the cost by stopping people from getting ill in
the first place. …
• Thirdly is building upon the good things we've done
already: Forty years of Medicaid and Medicare. I would
extend Medicaid to poorer families, 100 percent of poverty;
the ones with children, 300 percent of poverty. …
• Last is the fourth principle, dealing with technology. …
Some $80 or $90 billion could be saved, not to mention the
morbidity rates by doing a far better job and utilizing the
technology that exists today.
|
|
END WAR IN IRAQ; ROLL
BACK PRESIDENT BUSH'S TAX CUTS FOR THE HIGHEST EARNERS
If you get rid of these permanent tax cuts to the top one
percent of income earners, get the war ended in Iraq that
we're spending $2 million a week, $8 million a month, we can
provide the resources to really move in this direction. So I
would make it a top priority in my administration. I
wouldn't want to put a time frame on it because I think it's
too important, but for us to get there as soon as possible.
|
 |
|
 |
John
Edwards
Democrat
|
|
REQUIRE EVERYONE TO GET
INSURANCE, SUBSIDIZED BY EMPLOYERS AND THE GOVERNMENT
What we're going to do is cover every single American,
including the 47 million who don't have coverage. We're
going to bring down costs for everybody. And for most
Americans, we're going to help them pay the cost. It's based
on a concept of shared responsibility. In the case of
employers, we're going to ask them to do more to either
insure all their employees or to contribute to their being
insured. The government will help subsidize the health care
and create health care markets so we have more competition
and deal with issues like preventative care, mental health
care, to make sure those kind of things -- chronic care --
are, in fact, being done. And then, finally, for
individuals, we're going to make sure they have insurance.
They have to have insurance so that everybody has health
insurance.
|
|
ROLL BACK PRESIDENT
BUSH'S TAX CUTS FOR THE HIGHEST EARNERS
The tax cuts that George Bush gave to people who make over
$200,000 a year will have to go away to pay for my health
care plan. My universal health care plan costs 90- to $120
billion a year. I do not believe, having spent a lot of time
on this, that you can achieve universal health care
without--without finding a revenue source, and that's my
revenue source.
|
 |
|
 |
Mike
Gravel
Democrat
|
|
ISSUE VOUCHERS TO
EVERYONE BASED ON THEIR PROJECTED NEEDS
Under
the plan we would issue vouchers to every single American.
And the vouchers, you don't pay for them, they're issued to
you. You sign up every year for them. And the vouchers will
have a very modest co-pay, a very modest deductible, but
that's it. Everybody gets the same product universally in
the United States of America. And then if you want more than
the product you got, you pay for it. …
The vouchers are set up for risk on an individual basis, not
on a collective this fits all, because if you're young, you
probably don't have a cost of more than $3,000. When you're
my age, it could be $150,000-$180,000 in one year. … One of
the facets of the plan would be to keep in place Medicare
and Medicaid and phase them out over time. Because plans to
put everybody on Medicare aren't going to fly financially
and just can't be met.
|
|
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT WITH
TAXPAYER'S MONEY; CONTROL COST BY MODERNIZING RECORDS
All Americans pay for it regardless of the system you have
now but the system you're going to get, single-payer Health
Care Voucher plan. … There's no magic in this whole process.
Somebody is going to pay. You know who pays, it's the
average American, one way or the other, particularly under
our present system. And so to want to trash the business
community and trash our tax system, which is already
corrupt, with greater corruption as a way to solve the
problem is a nonstarter. … The way the plan is designed, it
won't raise costs, because the 30 percent that they're
talking about is paper cost. If you took that and put it
into some real costs in health care, we'd cover everybody
without raising any costs.
|
 |
|
 |
Dennis
Kucinich
Democrat
|
|
ESTABLISH MEDICARE FOR
ALL
A
not-for-profit health care system is not only possible, but
H.R. 676, a bill that I introduced, and a number of
Congressmen, the Conyers-Kucinich bill, actually establishes
Medicare for all, a single-payer system and it's a
not-for-profit system. It's time we ended this thought that
health care is a privilege. It is a basic right, and it's
time to end this control that insurance companies have not
only over health care but over our political system. … I'm
talking about a real deal for the American people, a
universal single-payer not-for-profit Medicare for all.
|
|
REMOVE COSTS RELATED TO
PRIVATE INSURERS
At
least 30% of the $3.2 trillion spent annually for health
care in the United States goes to the for-profit system,
while 50 million Americans, many of them working, are
without health insurance. About $660 billion goes for
corporate profits, executive salaries, stock options,
advertising, marketing, and the cost of paperwork. If we
took all that money and we put it into a public health
system, a national health care plan, we would have enough
money to cover everything for everyone.
IMPLEMENT TAXES FOR THE HIGHEST EARNERS
AND A PAYROLL TAX
(B) Increasing personal income taxes on the top 5
percent income earners.
(C) Instituting a modest and progressive excise tax on
payroll and self-employment income.
(D) Instituting a small tax on stock and bond
transactions.
|
 |
|
 |
Barack
Obama
Democrat
|
|
REQUIRE CHILDREN TO GET
INSURANCE;
AIMS FOR UNIVERSAL COVERAGE
The main disagreement with John [Edwards] and I is John
believes that we have to have mandatory insurance for
everyone in order to have universal health care. My belief
is that most families want health care but they can't afford
it. And so my emphasis is on driving down the costs, taking
on the insurance companies, making sure that they are
limited in the ability to extract profits and deny coverage
-- that we make sure the drug companies have to do what's
right by their patients instead of simply hoarding their
profits. If we do those things then I believe that we can
drive down the costs for families. In fact, we've got very
conservative, credible estimates that say we can save
families that do have health insurance about a thousand
dollars a year, and we can also make sure that we provide
coverage for everybody else. And we do provide mandatory
health care for children.
DETAILED PLAN
|
|
ROLL BACK PRESIDENT
BUSH'S TAX CUTS FOR PEOPLE EARNING OVER $250,000
To help pay for all this, we will ask all but the smallest
businesses who don’t make a meaningful contribution today to
the health care coverage of their employees to do so by
supporting this new plan. And we’ll also allow the temporary
Bush tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans to expire.
|
 |
|
 |
Bill
Richardson
Democrat
|
|
REQUIRE EVERYONE TO GET
INSURANCE, SUBSIDIZED BY EMPLOYERS AND THE GOVERNMENT
No. 1, my plan is mandatory. You do have everybody sharing
-- the employer, the employee, you have the state and the
federal government. Secondly, I believe that we can have a
plan where if you were satisfied with your health care plan,
you can keep it. No new bureaucracy. But in addition to
that, you focus on prevention. You allow everybody to get
the Congressional plan that every member here has.You bring
Medicare 55 and over.
Our main responsibility should be to insure all children
under five. We've done that in New Mexico and we should
do that nationally. Secondly, we should insure all
working adults, all working families. The third phase
would be the chronically unemployed. The way you do that
is by improving efficiencies and costs. The way you do
that is not have Medicare and Medicaid covering seniors
and disabled, it should be one. We should expand the
S-Chip [State Children's Health Insurance Program] to
cover children.
|
|
FORM PARTNERSHIP WITH
HEALTH CARE COMMUNITY
I would not increase taxes. I believe that, if anything,
Democrats have been viewed — our solution is always to
increase taxes, and we shouldn't. … I don't think the
solution of the Democratic Party should always be to either
spend more or tax more. I believe if we have partnerships
between hospitals, between communities, between the state,
the federal government, and you give flexibility to the
states, we can have universal health care.
|
 |
|
 |
|
REPUBLICANS |
|
DETAILS OF THEIR PLANS |
|
PAYING FOR ADDITIONAL COSTS |
 |
Sam
Brownback
Republican
|
|
ADVOCATES MARKET-BASED
HEALTH CARE; ESTABLISH REGULATORY COMPETITION AMONG STATES
|
|
NOT AVAILABLE
|
 |
|
 |
James
Gilmore
Republican
|
|
HAS NOT ADDRESSED THE
ISSUE OF HEALTH CARE IN RECENT APPEARANCES; HIS CAMPAIGN WEB
SITE DOES NOT ADDRESS THE ISSUE
His actions on health care as the governor of
Virginia, from 1998 to 2002, can be found
here.
|
|
NOT AVAILABLE
|
 |
|
 |
Rudy
Giuliani
Republican |
|
ADVOCATES MARKET-BASED
HEALTH CARE; MAKE PRIVATE INSURANCE AFFORDABLE THROUGH TAX
DEDUCTIONS
What
I would do is change the whole model that we have for health
insurance in this country. The problem with our health
insurance is it’s government- and employer-dominated. People
don’t make individual choices. It’s your health; you should
own your health insurance. We should be giving you a major
tax deduction — $15,000 for a family — so you can buy your
own health insurance. If you buy health insurance for $8,000
or $9,000, you’ll save $5,000 or $6,000 in tax-free money.
Then we should have a health savings account in which you
can put some money aside to pay for your ordinary medical
expenses. Health insurance should become like homeowners
insurance or like car insurance.
|
|
HAS NOT ADDRESSED HOW HE
WOULD PAY FOR THE TAX DEDUCTIONS; HAS SAID THAT A
FREE-MARKET WOULD BRING DOWN COSTS
We
need 100 million Americans making different decisions that
will bring down the cost of health insurance, it will bring
down the cost of prescription medicines. Free-market
principles are the only things that reduce cost and improve
quality.
|
 |
|
 |
Mike
Huckabee
Republican
|
|
ADVOCATES MARKET-BASED
HEALTH CARE; MAKE PRIVATE INSURANCE AFFORDABLE THROUGH TAX
DEDUCTIONS AND COST CONTROL MEASURES
We don’t need universal health care mandated by federal
edict or funded through ever-higher taxes. We do need to get
serious about preventive health care instead of chasing more
and more dollars to treat chronic disease, which currently
gobbles up 80% of our health care costs, and yet is often
avoidable. The result is that we’ll be able to deliver
better care where and when it’s needed.
I advocate policies that will encourage the private sector
to seek innovative ways to bring down costs and improve the
free market for health care services. … I also value the
states’ role as laboratories for new market-based
approaches, and I will encourage those efforts.

|
|
IMPLEMENT COST CONTROL
MEASURES
We can make health care more affordable by reforming medical
liability; adopting electronic record keeping; making health
insurance more portable from one job to another; expanding
health savings accounts to everyone, not just those with
high deductibles; and making health insurance tax deductible
for individuals and families as it now is for businesses.
Low-income families would get tax credits instead of
deductions.
|
 |
|
 |
Duncan
Hunter
Republican
|
|
ADVOCATES MARKET-BASED
HEALTH CARE; OPPOSED TO GOVERNMENT-SUBSIDIZED UNIVERSAL
HEALTH CARE
I am not for universal health care. If everything is paid
for by the government, you'll have companies trying to get
in and trying to overcharge. And you’ll lose what I call a
consumer interest, in keeping the cost of health care down.
LET AMERICANS SHOP FOR INSURANCE ACROSS STATE
LINES
We need to be able to buy our health care insurance across
state lines. Right now the same single policy that can be
purchased in Long Beach for $73 costs $334 in New Jersey.
The states lock up the insurance industry. They won't let
Americans buy across state lines just like they do
everything else. If we're able to do that, we're going to
bring down the cost of health insurance.
|
|
NOT AVAILABLE
|
 |
|
 |
John
McCain
Republican
|
|
HAS PLEDGED AFFORDABLE
HEALTH CARE FOR EVERY AMERICAN WITHOUT A FEDERAL MANDATE;
EXPECTED TO RELEASE A DETAILED PLAN THIS SUMMER
I think that we can make health care affordable and
available without a mandate. Six of the eight million
children that haven’t taken advantage of the S-Chip is
because they just haven’t signed up. Community health
centers need to be expanded. There’s a whole variety of
things that we can do before we mandate health care for
every American. One of the problems we have is that there’s
a lot of healthy Americans that say, ‘I just don’t want
health insurance.’ … I'm going to have a plan that every
American can take advantage of and afford. … We're working
on it. We've been working on it for a long time. It's a very
tough issue, but I know many of the elements right now - tax
incentives for people of low incomes so that they can afford
health care, community health centers, expand the S-Chip,
put health care online, help medical malpractice reform,
make health savings accounts more available. I mean, there's
a long list of steps that we must take in order to make
health care available and affordable.
|
|
SAYS UNIVERSAL HEALTH
CARE IS POSSIBLE WITHOUT A TAX INCREASE
I'm certainly not interested in raising people's taxes, as
many of the Democrats are interested in doing. I'm
absolutely opposed to that.
-- On "This Week," June 10, 2007
|
 |
|
 |
Ron
Paul
Republican
|
|
ADVOCATES MARKET-BASED
HEALTH CARE; OPPOSED TO FEDERAL MANDATE
It’s time to rethink the whole system. The rise of HMOs has
created a harmful collusion between politicians, drug
companies, and organized medicine that raises the price of
health care by stifling competition between providers. And
all this in favor of moving us towards universal health
care! … I believe strongly that patients are better served
by having an element of choice in the matter, which is why I
support letting the free-market determine health care costs.
This won’t happen, however, until we unravel the HMO web and
change the tax code to allow individuals to fully deduct
health care costs from their taxes, as employers can.
|
|
WANTS TO MAKE HEALTH
CARE MORE AFFORDABLE WITHOUT TAX INCREASE
Congress needs to craft innovative legislation that makes
health care more affordable without raising taxes or
increasing the deficit. It also needs to repeal bad laws
that keep health care costs higher than necessary.
|
 |
|
 |
Mitt
Romney
Republican
|
|
ENCOURAGE STATES TO
DEVELOP MARKET-BASED HEALTH CARE PROGRAMS; OPPOSED TO A
NATIONAL VERSION OF THE PLAN HE SUPPORTED FOR MASSACHUSSETS
AS GOVERNOR OF THE STATE, REQUIRING EVERYONE TO GET
INSURANCE
I
like the idea of letting states have some flexibility to
develop their own programs to get more and more people
insured. We found a way to get everybody in our state,
Massachusetts, insured. I like the plan. I think it's one of
the best things we did in my administration.
It's not perfect. We will learn from it. But the idea is for
people who can afford insurance make sure they get their
premiums down by taking mandates off insurance companies.
Let the insurance companies offer true market-based
products. And then for people who can't afford insurance,
help them buy their own private policy. Don't put them on
Medicaid. Get them private insurance. Get everybody in the
system.
It's a bit like bringing work to welfare. Bring personal
responsibility to health care. Get the government out of the
health care business for those 45 million uninsured, and let
individuals own their own policies.
|
|
SAYS UNIVERSAL HEALTH
CARE IS POSSIBLE WITHOUT A TAX INCREASE
It’s a conservative idea insisting that individuals have
responsibility for their own health care. I think it appeals
to people on both sides of the aisle: insurance for everyone
without a tax increase.
|
 |
|
 |
Tom
Tancredo
Republican
|
|
ADVOCATES MARKET-BASED
HEALTH CARE; WOULD NOT RULE OUT FEDERAL SUBSIDIES FOR THE
NEEDY
As for the uninsured: as many as 25 percent of them are
illegal aliens and should be deported or encouraged to
leave. For citizens and legal residents who are employed by
businesses which cannot afford coverage, I favor association
health plans which band small businesses together to access
lower-cost insurance. For those out of work, state
governments should be the primary source of relief, although
I would not rule out federal incentives or limited subsidies
to make sure families who have fallen on hard times are not
without coverage.
|
|
PROPOSES IMMIGRATION
REFORM TO CURB COST
The two major problems are the high cost of care and the
number of uninsured. Tort reform and immigration enforcement
would save the system billions and drive down costs. In
California alone, illegal immigrants cost the system $800
million annually and have forced 84 hospitals to close.
As for the uninsured: as many as 25 percent of them are
illegal aliens and should be deported or encouraged to
leave.

|
 |
|
 |
Tommy
Thompson
Republican
|
|
MAKE HEALTH CARE MORE
AFFORDABLE AND ACCESSIBLE WITHOUT FEDERAL MANDATE
We
must build a system that is affordable and accessible for
everyone. And we can do this without government-run health
care that robs our great nation of its ingenuity in
developing new cures and treatments for deadly diseases. And
we can do it only when we take some common-sense steps to
bring our health care system into the 21st century. … We
must use the private sector and public sector to provide
health insurance for all.

We've
got to completely transform the health care system, make it
a wellness system, and make it a prevention system. ...We
have 125 million Americans that have one or more chronic
illnesses. In order to change this we have to educate the
American people about tobacco, about diabetes, about
cardiovascular [diseases] and about obesity. You do that,
you'll be able to change health care.

|
|
IMPLEMENT MEASURES TO
CONTROL COSTS AND SAVE MONEY
Twenty
five percent of Americans use two-thirds of the cost of
health care. If you manage those diseases, you can reduce
that down to 50 percent and save lots of money. …
Information technology -- electronic medical records, a
patient bill of rights, and be able to have E-prescribing,
and if you do that, you're going to be able to save billions
of dollars. If you just go paperless, ladies and gentlemen,
you will save 10 percent of the cost of health .
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jon
Garrido, President, The Blue Dogs of the
National Democratic Party
Published, Web Design
and Hosted by The Jon Garrido Network, Phoenix, Arizona
85016, 602.244.1000 Jon@JonGarrido.com
www.jongarrido.com
www.jongarrido.net
www.jgnet.net
www.jongarridohomes.com
www.fsbousa.us
www.vport.us
www.hispanic.cc
www.uschica.com
www.latina.ms
www.mujerusa.us
www.subete.us
www.aznews.us
www.lamnews.com
www.ustimes.us
www.wnews.us
www.bluedogs.us
www.51plus.com
www.hispanic5.com
www.hispanic6.com
www.ustimes5.com
www.actaz.org
www.azlec.org
www.aqaba.us
www.phxnews.us
www.webstore.bz
|
|
|