U.S. Farm Subsidies Favor Big Over Small,
White Over Black
|
o |
|
 |
|
Rogers Morris, far right, grows sweet potatoes, soybeans and vegetables on about
500 acres in Mound Bayou. |
|
|
SHELBY, Miss.
(By Gilbert M. Gaul and Dan Morgan,
Washington Post) June 20, 2007 —
From 2001 to 2005, the federal government spent nearly $1.2 billion in
agricultural subsidies to boost farmers' incomes and invigorate local
economies in this poverty-stricken region of the Mississippi Delta.
Most residents are black, but less than 5 percent of
the money went to black farmers. They own relatively little land, and so
they generally do not qualify for the payments. Ninety-five percent of
the money went to large, commercial farms, virtually all of which have
white owners.
In Bolivar County, where Shelby is located, farmers
received a total of $200 million in crop subsidies over the five-year
period, while just $11 million in Rural Development grants from the
Agriculture Department went to replace the abandoned factories, decaying
houses and boarded-up downtowns in dozens of dirt-poor, majority-black
Delta towns.
Many of these towns are trapped in a long, painful
death spiral, plagued by poverty, crime and unemployment. More than
100,000 people — nearly a quarter of the population — have fled in
recent decades in search of a better life.
"It's just a sad situation," said Judy Hill, who leads
a women's group that is desperately trying to rescue what is left of the
small agricultural town of Shelby, which has a cotton gin, two liquor
stores and not much else. "There's no industry, no factories, no hope
for the future, nothing to keep the people here. And what the answer is,
I don't know."
The farm bill that Congress is now crafting is a
complex mosaic of competing goals, including income support for farmers,
conservation incentives and the preservation of rural communities by
spurring economic growth. Farm subsidies are meant to tide growers over
when prices fall or when disasters strike. The Rural Development grants,
on the other hand, are supposed to help small, struggling communities
such as Shelby. Yet in the Delta, farm subsidies are massive, while
Rural Development money is relatively scanty. From 2001 to 2005, the
Agriculture Department awarded $1.18 billion in subsidies but just $54.8
million in Rural Development grants for housing, new businesses, water
systems and other projects, a Washington Post investigation found.
"The policy choice that Congress has made is so
stark," said Charles W. Fluharty, director of the Rural Policy Research
Institute at the University of Missouri at Columbia. "You see the
effects in lots of poor rural communities. But the tragedy is
exacerbated in the minority communities."
Sen. Thad Cochran (R-Miss.) said the importance of
agriculture to the Mississippi Delta economy is "undeniable" because it
contributes hundreds of millions in state and federal taxes and is "a
driving force" behind progress there in the past few years. "The
challenge we face centers around ensuring that we pursue the most
responsible and fair policies when seeking to sustain our nation's
agriculture industry," he told The Post in an e-mail interview.
The wide disparity between subsidies for farmers and
Rural Development money for agriculture communities highlights one of
the contradictions of federal farm policy, which favors big agriculture
over small farms and poor rural towns. In the Delta, it has helped to
preserve a two-tiered economy and a widening economic chasm between the
races, according to local residents, government officials and
researchers.
"You're in the Delta. Most of the real economy is
controlled by large families. It has been that way for 200 to 300
years," said Ben F. Burkett, a black small farmer who also works part
time for the Mississippi Association of Cooperatives. "We'd like to
break that cycle and create new businesses. But there's not much money
for that. You see what we get from Rural Development. It's not much, is
it?"
Agriculture Department officials declined to comment
for this article.
Farmland in the Mississippi Delta has been passed down
from generation to generation and built up through acquisitions, with
whites controlling most of the land. In Bolivar County, whites now own
421,000 acres, records show, while blacks own 22,000 acres. Because farm
subsides are based on farm size and production, most of the payments go
to the large operations.
Farm-state lawmakers have repeatedly argued that the
farm subsidies will trickle down to the local economies, spurring
growth. But as farms consolidate and become more mechanized, there are
fewer jobs, especially for unskilled laborers.
"The problem with agriculture is that it's not a
wealth builder for the people who live here," said John Greer Jr.,
director of the Mid-Delta Empowerment Zone in Leflore County. "It's a
wealth builder for the few who own the property and the resources."
But the farmers say they would not be able to survive
without their subsidies. "I am not getting rich on subsidies," said G.
Rives Neblett, a Shelby lawyer and businessman whose family has farmed
here for three generations. Farms in which Neblett holds an interest
have received about $3 million in federal payments since 2001.
"I understand the disparity and desperately wish there
was something we could do about it," he said. "But without the safety
net of subsidies for prices and bad weather, we would have no more
agriculture in the Delta, and agriculture is all we've got left."
'We've
Lost Generations'When income supports for
farmers were first passed during the Great Depression, nearly 1 in 4
Americans lived on a farm. Today, 1 in 75 lives on a farm, and 1 in 750
on a full-time commercial farm. Still, the subsidies flow, with cotton
and rice producers in the Delta among the largest beneficiaries.
Despite the payments, many rural economies have seen
their populations wilt and have lost thousands of jobs. That is true in
poor, isolated farm towns in the Great Plains states, as well as in the
Delta, where sprawling farms abut tiny towns like Shelby and Mound
Bayou, which are all but boarded up.
This trend is especially pronounced in this northwest
corner of the Mississippi Delta, where subsidies and poverty rank among
the highest in the nation.
Bolivar County has lost nearly 5 percent of its
population and more than 10 percent of its non-farm jobs since 2001,
federal data show. Sunflower County lost 6 percent of its population and
19 percent of its non-farm jobs. Humphreys County lost 6 percent of its
population and almost 36 percent of its non-farm jobs.
"We've lost entire generations of young blacks because
we told them to stay in school and get a good job," said John Mayo, a
state legislator who represents several Delta counties. "But
unfortunately there's not a good job for them to get when they get out.
The smart kids are leaving. It leaves us with the families who have
given up hope."
Some officials and residents blame crime, drugs,
underperforming schools, an unskilled labor pool and poor work habits
for the area's demise, not a shortage of federal aid. Neblett said that
children "don't have a dog's chance" of succeeding in some Delta
schools.
Mimi Dossett, the Bolivar County administrator, said:
"We have had employers who just gave up and left. It takes longer to
train people around here because of the poor education . . . and
workforce turnover is terrible."
"It's a tough situation," said Willie F. Brown, a
member of the Humphreys County Board of Supervisors since 1988. "We
hired an economic development person. They leave empty-handed. They come
back empty-handed."
One industry that is succeeding in the Delta is casino
gambling, which arrived in Tunica County, near Memphis, in 1993. At the
time, the county had an annual budget of $3 million and most of the same
problems that the rest of the Delta had. Today, it has a budget of $51
million and uses the money for new roads, recreation centers and housing
grants for the elderly and disabled.
"The casinos pay great benefits. The wages average
maybe $9 to $10 an hour," said Clifton Johnson, the chief financial
officer for Tunica County. "Some people would probably say that's not a
living wage. But I would say for this area that is a living wage."
Goal Is 'One New Business'
Decades ago, the agricultural town of Shelby was a
thriving community with stores and restaurants and a busy downtown.
Mayor Dorothy Grim recalled traveling here from a nearby town as a child
to do her "shopping and trading." The cotton and rice farms were a
source of jobs and money.
But as agriculture changed, so did Shelby. Farms got
bigger. Combines went from four rows to six to eight, and now to a
dozen. There was less need for unskilled laborers. Less money changing
hands.
Small businesses began to close. School integration
and a complicated race history accelerated the flight of white families.
Today, more than 90 percent of Shelby's 2,700 residents are black. The
median household income of $17,798 is less than half the national
average. Most of the stores straddling downtown Beale Street are boarded
up. Many neighborhoods are scarred with tumbledown bungalows and
weed-choked lots.
A few years back, Grim, Hill and a cluster of other
spirited women formed a group called Shelby Women United to tackle the
town's problems. With a state grant and a lot of elbow grease, they
helped transform an old train depot into a library. Volunteers tore down
80 dilapidated buildings and removed abandoned cars. Now, the group is
searching for ways to attract businesses and start a chamber of
commerce.
"The goal is to get one new business to go into one of
these abandoned buildings," said Hill, 66, who moved to Shelby nine
years ago and is white. "That would be a good start."
Shelby has received modest help from the Agriculture
Department's Rural Development program but is seeking much more. From
2001 to 2005, it received a total of $106,000 that was used to buy
police cars and a mower.
"We would like to get more help from Rural
Development," Grim said. "But it's hard because we're small and don't
have the staff."
In 2005, Congress slashed the Rural Development budget
by $439 million as part of a budget reconciliation. The remaining
funding is stretched across 40 programs, including water and sewer
projects, rental assistance, and grants for police cars. More than half
of the awards are loans and loan guarantees, not grants. Four of the 10
counties studied by The Post received no economic development money.
"It takes an enormous amount of energy and time to get
anything done that is not farm-related," said Robert L. Jackson, a state
senator from Quitman County and director of a nonprofit development
corporation.
'They Have No Hope'Rogers
Morris, 61, operates one of the few large black-owned farms in Bolivar
County. He grows sweet potatoes, soybeans and vegetables on about 500
acres near Mound Bayou. "We're not impacted much," he said of the
federal subsidies. "I maybe get $8,000 to $9,000" a year. "It helps a
little. But the subsidies basically go to white farmers."
In the mid-1990s, Morris received a federal grant to
help start a sweet-potato processing plant in Mound Bayou. The idea was
to provide jobs for some of the young unemployed men during planting and
harvest seasons. The potatoes came from the fields of local black
farmers. The plant created about 20 temporary jobs, Morris said.
Now, he and several other black farmers hope to get
help from Rural Development to expand. Their plan is to use the same
facility to clean and process a variety of fresh vegetables and sell
them at local markets and to the casinos in Tunica County. "We want to
use people who are unskilled, people who are left on the wayside,"
Morris said. "So many of our people are on the corners. They have no
hope. It is a real struggle."
Morris has been more fortunate than many black
farmers. He grew up in a farm family and returned here after receiving
undergraduate and master's degrees. He has slowly built up his farm and
now is able to borrow from a local bank. "Borrowing has always been a
problem" for small black farmers, he said. "And borrowing from the
government has not been the best, either. That has hampered the black
farmer."
A decade-old lawsuit by black farmers against the
Agriculture Department alleged a pattern of discrimination. Settlements
are still being sorted out and Morris said that he could possibly
receive a cash award. The department has since created a program to help
minority farmers, but the impact has been modest. The powerful county
farm committees, which hire the county Farm Service Agency executive and
help enforce federal farm policies, continue to be dominated by whites.
Nationally, there are 7,882 committee members, but just 90 of them are
black. In Mississippi there are 236 committee members, only eight of
whom are black.
Neblett, the Shelby farmer, worries that the economic
and education gaps between whites and blacks in the Delta have grown so
wide they may never be bridged. "We're now to the point that it is such
a culture difference between those who are privileged and who had the
education that I don't know how you will close that [gap]," he said.
Pat W. Denton, who is from a prominent white Shelby
farm family, recently moved to Cleveland, Miss. He still rents out 1,600
acres back home and is part owner of the local cotton gin. "When I was a
kid we had theaters, service stations and steakhouses in Shelby," he
said. "Now, it's just going down."
As farmers shift from cotton to corn to take advantage
of higher prices, even the cotton gin is emptying out. "We used to do
35,000 bales," Denton said. "We might do 15,000 this year."
Said Judy Hill: "That's what's happening all over.
These Delta towns, they're just folding up."